Legal Action
Does 1-9 v. Department of Justice
Filed in: U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia
Summary
Plaintiffs, a coalition of Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) employees who investigated alleged participants in the January 6, 2021 attack on the U.S. Capitol Building and/or the unlawful removal and storage of classified documents by Donald J. Trump at Mar-a-Lago filed suit against the Trump-Vance administration to prevent further dissemination of information about investigators. Upon returning to office, President Trump ordered the FBI to make a list of all employees involved in the January 6th and Mar-a-Lago investigations and to share that list with the Department of Justice for investigation. The plaintiffs argued that the dissemination of this list would lead to unlawful retaliation against them, including wrongful termination and persecution. The plaintiffs argued that the creation and dissemination of a list of January 6th and Mar-a-Lago investigators violates the Privacy Act, the Administrative Procedure Act, as well as the First Amendment rights of FBI agents. Plaintiffs seek injunctive relief.
On February 6, 2025 this case was consolidated with Federal Bureau of Investigation Agents Association v. Department of Justice,1:25-cv-00328, continuing under the name Does 1-9 v. Department of Justice.
Plaintiffs
- John and Jane Does 1-9
- Federal Bureau of Investigation Agents Association
Plaintiffs' Counsel
- Law Office of Mark S. Zaid
- Center for Employment Justice
- Koskoff, Koskoff & Bieder
- Democracy Defenders Fund
Defendants
- U.S. Department of Justice